Comments on: Cops raid massage parlor that employed high school girls

By: an

an — Sun, 17 Jan 2010 09:57:50 +0000

razed, not raised, and either way it’s not the most fitting word to use.

By: oro_the_dog

oro_the_dog — Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:37:04 +0000

“I mean a regular message done by someone of 16 should be allowed imo.”

Whoa. =) Do want! (..but i don’t want my daughters or sister to ever do that…)

By: Snow

Snow — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:36:14 +0000

It really depends on the type of service.
I mean a regular message done by someone of 16 should be allowed imo. Rubbing your body sensually against the client’s shouldn’t be allowed. But it seems this was a case of the latter, so it’s almost a sexual favour, and that’s just wrong.

By: Ajapa

Ajapa — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:50:10 +0000

…likely breaking the law by employing high school girls that would rub their bodies against male clients.

To be precise, being a high school girl does not necessarily mean under 18, but rather, many perverts just believe that being a high school girl is highly praised.

The highlight of the clip is… A girl who had once worked there was told like, “You do not need to worry about it even when policemen come unless you have touched [client's] nipples and such… since it is not illegal unless you do so.”

Be careful. Never let high school girls touch your nipples, otherwise your students would be arrested! Policemen, work hard!

By: asdafdfasfasffda

asdafdfasfasffda — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:14:25 +0000

“Why don’t you have a seat”