JapanProbe Friends - Featured Members


Cops raid massage parlor that employed high school girls

January 13th, 2010 by James

massage

Back in November, I posted about a Japanese investigative news report that revealed a massage parlor in Yokohama was likely breaking the law by employing high school girls that would rub their bodies against male clients. It seems the police finally got around to raising the place and making some arrests:

Four men were arrested for violations of the child welfare law. Included among them was the manager who angrily avoided questions from NTV’s reporters in the previous report.

Eight of the girls working in the massage parlor at the time of the raid were under 18.



Related Posts:
 

Investigative report on teen girls giving massages in Yokohama

Junior High Girls Abuse Police Officers

Shibuya is still shady

Prostitution in South Korea: The Japanese meda reports

The Rise and Fall of Bloomers (Video)


RSS feed

5 Comments »

Comment by asdafdfasfasffda
2010-01-13 19:14:25

“Why don’t you have a seat”

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

 
Comment by Ajapa
2010-01-13 19:50:10

…likely breaking the law by employing high school girls that would rub their bodies against male clients.

To be precise, being a high school girl does not necessarily mean under 18, but rather, many perverts just believe that being a high school girl is highly praised.

The highlight of the clip is… A girl who had once worked there was told like, “You do not need to worry about it even when policemen come unless you have touched [client's] nipples and such… since it is not illegal unless you do so.”

Be careful. Never let high school girls touch your nipples, otherwise your students would be arrested! Policemen, work hard!

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

 
Comment by Snow
2010-01-13 23:36:14

It really depends on the type of service.
I mean a regular message done by someone of 16 should be allowed imo. Rubbing your body sensually against the client’s shouldn’t be allowed. But it seems this was a case of the latter, so it’s almost a sexual favour, and that’s just wrong.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Comment by oro_the_dog
2010-01-15 09:37:04

“I mean a regular message done by someone of 16 should be allowed imo.”

Whoa. =) Do want! (..but i don’t want my daughters or sister to ever do that…)

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

 
 
Comment by an
2010-01-17 18:57:50

razed, not raised, and either way it’s not the most fitting word to use.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment. (Please close your HTML tags.)

If your comment isn't showing up, it's probably stuck in the spam filter or in moderation. Instead of typing the same comment over and over and sending it, contact us. Most comments are visible within a few minutes of their posting.
This site is not an open forum: we have rules. Read our discussion policy for more details.

Trackback responses to this post