Illegal fishing – Koreans violate Japanese territorial waters

In a perfect world, however, these people would realize that since there happen to be two rocks and two claimants, if you give one to Japan and call it Takeshima and the other to Korea and name it Dokdo then everyone would be happy.

Or, better yet, both Korea and Japan could place the case before the International Court in the Hague and allow a third party with no stake in the territorial dispute to decide which country has a legitimate claim to the islets.

Japan, since the smaller one (with more usable land, apparently) would be more amenable to the currently residing Korean couple and the forty some odd police officers charged with protecting them

“In a perfect world, however, these people would realize that since there happen to be two rocks and two claimants, if you give one to Japan and call it Takeshima and the other to Korea and name it Dokdo then everyone would be happy.”

Would Japan accept to do the same with the diaoyu island? Give to China half the island and than, everybody is happy?

It was probably labeled anti-Japan based on the observation that Korea not honoring the 1999 agreement about fishing around the Liancourt Rocks, all the while invading Japanese waters to fish (and using environmentally damaging methods) is hypocritical and shows a degree of contempt for Japan and agreements with them.
But I doubt the individual fishermen doing the actual crossing of the borders have anything to do with the barring of Japanese fishermen from around the Liancourt Rocks, so I do agree whether to call this “anti-Japan” is a bit contentious.

And Japan is just arresting and fining intruders so it’s not anti-Korean at all.

The “anti-” would creep in there only if the assumption was made that the Korean fishermen were invading Japanese waters because they think Japan is beneath them, and/or Japan is arresting the Korean fishermen only to be mean to them. Both of which is plausible but somewhat doubtful.