South Korea may begin commercial whaling operations
If the International Whaling Commission grants Japan limited rights to coastal whaling in exchange for a scaling down of its antarctic whaling operations, South Korea will also want a piece of the action, according to Reuters:
“This would open the floodgates for commercial whaling,” the WSPA marine mammal programme manager told Reuters in Rome.
Nicolas Entrup, spokesman for the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society (WDCS), said minke whales in Korean waters already faced extinction because of “by-catching” — when whales are accidentally caught in fishing nets, then sold for eating — and would face an accelerated threat if Korea resumes whaling.
“We should be closing the loopholes that permit whaling rather than creating new loopholes,” Entrup told Reuters.
Korean whaling helped supply the Japanese market for much of the 20th century, especially during Japanese occupation. It had a “scientific” catch of about 69 whales in 1986 but has since mostly abided by the global moratorium declared that year.
[via ROK Drop]
- Akihabara News – Gadgetry from Japan (Subscribe)
- dannychoo.com – Your portal to Japan (Subscribe)
- Kirainet.com – A geek in Japan (Subscribe)
| Related Posts: |
|
Greenpeace’s Anti-Japanese Commercial (Video) Japan fails to secure a majority in whaling vote |
Full RSS Feed
“Should Japan and Korea be allowed to catch a limited number of non-endangered whales?”
The key there is NON-ENDANGERED. If applying regulations to them and then hunting the whales is sustainable and they’re not endangered, aside from silly “save the whales” nonsense, why shouldn’t they be able to hunt them? I wouldn’t eat them due to mercury content, but I don’t see any harm in hunting non-endangered animals.
Rate this comment:
0 
0
Whales are not fish! They have huge brains larger than ours, and form long term relationships. Some whales would live for over a century if not murdered. Stop the new whaling holocaust. Boycott all commercial whaling nations!
Rate this comment:
0 
0
Brain size has nothing to do with intelligence.
Whales are mammals, just like cows, yet we tend to eat many more cows.
Turtles live for over a century, yet there is no outrage over turtle soup.
If the species isn’t endangered, the only reasons to protest using it for food are (1) a personal philosophy where an individual chooses not to take the life of any living organism (which is impossible as plants are living organisms and they have a more immediate and purposeful existence), or (2) a personal attachment to an organism based on an internalized fantasy-image.
The best example of #2 is the idea that many Westerners have regarding eating dogs. It strikes Westerners as shocking because Westerners have a long history of domesticating that particular animal, and so eating them is like eating a family member. Yet in the East, where cows were difficult or impossible to raise, dogs were raised as a food source. (And I should mention because most people are misinformed – Dogs that are pets and dogs that are food are very different breeds)
I haven’t once heard a sound, logical argument against sustainable whaling. The focus should actually be on tuna, as they’re being overly farmed and their numbers are rapidly depleting – And it pains me to say that because I love me some o-toro and maguro.
Rate this comment:
0 
0
“Non-endangered” today but once everyone wants a piece of the action we can flip “Non-endangered” to “extinct” in a matter of months. It’s all about momentum, we’ve got to stop Japan’s actions before they put a bad influence on the rest of the world.
Rate this comment:
0 
0
Exaggerate a bit, eh?
Whales are in no danger of being hunted to near-extinction again as in the 19th century.
Why?
We don’t use whale oil anymore, we use the black stuff from the ground.
I’ll bet $1000 to any of you that minke whales will not be hunted to extinction even if Korea gets to whale and Japan totally abandons all quotas. Any takers?
[Of course, I have a few perpetual motion machine nuts who "owe" me hypothetical $1000 bets because, surprise! the perpetual motion machine that was "Just about to be announced and revolutionize the world!!1!", never got announced. Same story.]
Ironically, the only reason whales might become more popular as a food source adn thus hunted more heavily is if the very same lefties who want to save the whales also manage to make cattle-raising, and thus beef, prohibitively expensive due to exaggerated claims about the environmetnal impact of cow farts.
Rate this comment:
0 
0
Oh non-endangered, do they even taste good?
Rate this comment:
0 
0
Give em an inch and they’ll take a mile. Japan has already done that and more with “research whaling” and I have no reason to believe Japan or Korea would restrain themselves any more with coastal whaling.
One would take “an extra” whale and so the other would too, back and forth. It would be just like Beavis and Butthead loaning each other the same dollar until they’ve bought a whole box of candy.
Rate this comment:
0 
0
you know fishing regulations work fairly well in most of the civilized world and that what took whales to neae-extinction in the 19th century was not whalling for food, right?
or is it just ignorance?
Rate this comment:
0 
0
Humans aren’t endangered (except by over population) I say open up human exploitation: Soylent Green before Whaleburgers!
Rate this comment:
0 
0