JapanProbe Friends - Featured Members


Biofuel-powered jet engine

January 31st, 2009 by James

JAL successfully tested a biofuel-powered jet engine yesterday:

One of the jumbo jet’s four Pratt & Whitney engines was run on a half-and-half mixture of biofuel and conventional jet fuel.

Boeing Co. developed the biofuel to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in flights. It derives mainly from camelina, a plant in the mustard family.

Camelina is inedible, making it less likely that its application to jet fuel will affect the world food market.



Related Posts:
 

Biofuel from wood chips

USB-powered Japanese lantern/speaker

USB-Powered Dog

Enjin Beatbox

Japan’s Chinese residents buying up powdered milk


RSS feed | Trackback URI

13 Comments »

Comment by Vonskippy
2009-01-31 12:22:32

And how many Hectares to fuel one plane?

BioFuel is the BIGGEST fantasy ever – the world uses MILLIONS of barrels of oil EVERY day.

There is not enough land on the planet to grow even a teeny tiny portion of that quantity in biofuels.

Comment by Eddie
2009-01-31 19:18:07

Exactly.

BioFuel is a no go.

 
 
Comment by John
2009-01-31 14:25:44

No to food for fuel!

The plant may be inedible but if it competes against edible plants for land then it will have an impact on the food market.

Comment by Haf
2009-01-31 19:37:30

Exactly what I was thinking.

I think globally this is the third or fourth test for biofuel mad from plants or algae done on bigger airplanes.

Maybe this kind of fuel can balance things out a bit in the near future but I think in the long run electric engines are the best option.

To be able to use them in a good way, much better batteries and capacitors are needed, as well as better performing photovoltaic materials and alternative sources of energy that take advantage of the energy in wind, water and the earth’s core.
That what the nations should invest in now, instead of pumping the money in failing banks, old technology and broken investments.

Comment by Jerry
2009-02-01 08:16:01

Lightning-powered aircraft?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Briton
2009-01-31 15:27:06

air new zealand did this months ago.

 
Comment by Level3
2009-02-01 15:01:57

The real question is, how much energy was used to make the biofuel?

Perhaps when they get the means to make fuel out of the wasted portions of edible/usable plants that are just going to be thrown out anyhow, AND some kind of genetically engineered bacteria that turns corn husks into oil…

But isn’t this still producing just as much, if not more, CO2, which the greens claim is the “real” culprit?

But then, anything that stops money flowing into the coffers of the oil producers who are not our friends (Islamic states, Venezuela, Russia) is a good thing.

Comment by The Overthinker
2009-02-01 20:13:03

The idea about biofuel is that the carbon dioxide that is released through combustion is the same amount of carbon dioxide that was taken in by the plant as it grew.

 
 
Comment by yoga boy
2009-02-01 17:04:30

Camelina may be inedible but the more resources (arable land, farming equipment, fertilizer) they devote to harvesting this the less there will be for growing actual food for human consumption.

So once again, we are back to fuel > food.

 
Comment by Bryce
2009-02-02 08:59:59

Air New Zealand isn’t the only kiwi company doing this sort of thing. There seems to be a partial solution to the biofuel dilemma there too = harvesting biofuels from plants grown on human shit, not arable land.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10381404

Apparently this company is going to start pumping out a million litres of fuel per year by April harvested from a small south island sewerage plant by the end of this year. With the amount of sewerage in the world imagine how much fuel that would make.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment. (Please close your HTML tags.)

If your comment isn't showing up, it's probably stuck in the spam filter or in moderation. Instead of typing the same comment over and over and sending it, contact us. Most comments are visible within a few minutes of their posting.
This site is not an open forum: we have rules. Read our discussion policy for more details.

Trackback responses to this post