JapanProbe Friends - Featured Members


Radiation leak was “no more harmful than a routine chest X-ray”

August 30th, 2008 by James

The United States has issued its final report on the case of an American submarine leaking radiation in Japan:

The United States assured Japan on Friday that the trace levels of radioactivity which leaked from the U.S. Navy submarine Houston during its visits to three Japanese ports were, even when combined, no more harmful than a routine chest X-ray and promised to ensure “stringent performance standard” in the future.

A final report given by the U.S. Embassy in Japan to the Foreign Ministry said the incident was the first of its kind in the more than 50 years that the U.S. Navy has operated nuclear reactors and reemphasized that the leakages posed “no adverse effect on human health, marine life, or the environment.”



Related Posts:
 

U.S. submarine leaks radiation in Japan

Special facility to monitor radiation levels at Yokosuka naval base

Agriculture Minister Akagi’s Beaten-Up Face

Japan News for July 20, 2007

Nuclear Accident Warnings on Your Cell Phone


RSS feed | Trackback URI

7 Comments »

Comment by onceuponatime
2008-08-30 14:53:31

and we all know how much they love chest x-rays in this country. what`s another one?

Comment by sputnik
2008-08-30 15:05:42

Yea, think of it as a freebie.

 
 
Comment by Darien Shields
2008-08-31 08:37:01

Is that really a negligible amount? I got my head X-Rayed for some dental work once, and I was told that here in the UK we have to keep records of how many times someone’s been X-Rayed or been in contact with radioactive materials so that we can keep it at a safe level (so if you’d already been X-Rayed 5 times in a year they wouldn’t give you another one unless it was important).

Is it different elsewhere…?

 
Comment by Alex
2008-08-31 11:06:57

So, it wasn’t life-threatening, just irresponsible.

This part struck me as odd:

“A final report given by the U.S. Embassy in Japan to the Foreign Ministry said the incident was the first of its kind in the more than 50 years that the U.S. Navy has operated nuclear reactors…”

Obviously there were no incidents reported to Japanese authorities in those 50 years, so the Japanese MOFA already has this information. Why include that in the report?

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment. (Please close your HTML tags.)

If your comment isn't showing up, it's probably stuck in the spam filter or in moderation. Instead of typing the same comment over and over and sending it, contact us. Most comments are visible within a few minutes of their posting.
This site is not an open forum: we have rules. Read our discussion policy for more details.

Trackback responses to this post