Education ministry drops Takeshima plans

The Japan Times reports that the Japanese government has dropped previously-announced plans to teach school children stronger views on the Liancourt Rocks dispute:
Japan will refrain from identifying Takeshima — a pair of Seoul-controlled rocky islets in the Sea of Japan known as Dokdo in South Korea — as an “integral part of Japan” in an educational document, a government paper said Tuesday.
Earlier this month, government sources said the education ministry planned to add the phrase in a supplementary document for new guidelines for social studies at junior high schools starting in the 2012 school year.
But the government apparently backed down after sharp reactions from South Korea. Tokyo has told Seoul it has yet to decide on the descriptions in the document, the paper said. Tokyo had received an inquiry from Seoul over the matter.
A quick search of South Korea’s English language media found no responses to this development, but I did find an article about a lonely man who is planning to swim around the islets 33 times and the following political cartoon, which plays on idiotic nationalist fears about Japan and America:

Japan and the United States are walking all over President Lee Myung-bak’s pragmatism and “future-orientedness” about relations with Japan.
The American cow is devouring what he wants of the country’s “quarantine inspection sovereignty.”
Japan wants to make off with Dokdo, pulling it from the country’s territorial sovereignty, saying, “Gimmie this, too, in the name of being future-oriented, okay?”


I honestly do not understand why such an insignificant island is seen to be so important. While I understand its importance as a symbol in Korea I feel people there worship the place far too much. The Japanese government should simply end claiming sovereignty over the island anyway, since it’s of little value to the country, the people in Japan don’t really seem to care about it all that much, and judging from what I’ve read it is in fact part of Korea. In that regard, this is a good step forward.
Rate this comment:
0
0
Its basically a matter of getting the EEZ that comes with possessing the ‘island’. The many of these voice from South Korea are basically regurgitating a nationalistic government line on the matter. Believe it or not most people in Japan that are not affected by this situation (i.e. people in the fishing industry, or for nationalistic reasons the uyoku groups) do not care much one way or the other.
Rate this comment:
0
0
To be exact most people in Japan are not excited about it, but I think it would fuel nationalism even among average Japanese if JG just gave away the islet.
Rate this comment:
0
0
I don’t think JG should just give it up… Keep claiming it but without making any unnecessary provocations like this. Then if anything valuable (oil etc) is every found within the islands EEZ force Korea to agree to share it.
Rate this comment:
0
0
A step forward? So at the end of the day, the loudest side wins?
Even if the Liancourt rocks had no financial value, it would be as if your next-door neighbor broke into your house and stole $5. You would be angrier about the break-in and theft rather than the financial loss itself.
Rate this comment:
0
0
I meant the above comment as in how it looks from both sides, regarding why it’s such a big issue.
Rate this comment:
0
0
Actually that cartoon has a fair point. South Korea is full of nationalist nut jobs but Japan shouldn’t make life harder for seemingly reasonable leaders like Lee Myung-Bak by making silly announcements like this.
Rate this comment:
0
0
The announcement was really stupid.
If the government really feel the need, just do it. If it doesn’t, don’t announce it at all.
By the announcement and re-announcement, Fukuda will get more scornful reactions from Japanese and Koreans. I AM very critical of him anyway.
Rate this comment:
0
0
Love the American cow.
South Korea is a psychiatrists dream state.
Rate this comment:
0
0