<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NTT DoCoMo&#8217;s New Logo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.japanprobe.com/2008/04/22/ntt-docomos-new-logo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2008/04/22/ntt-docomos-new-logo/</link>
	<description>Japan News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:55:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Karisu</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2008/04/22/ntt-docomos-new-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-163717</link>
		<dc:creator>Karisu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=4378#comment-163717</guid>
		<description>I subscribe to the &quot;keep it simple&quot; school of design, so I&#039;m a huge fan of the new logo.  The old one, like someone stated above, is far to busy, and I don&#039;t think the elements blend together well (all the extra lines and dots).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I subscribe to the &#8220;keep it simple&#8221; school of design, so I&#8217;m a huge fan of the new logo.  The old one, like someone stated above, is far to busy, and I don&#8217;t think the elements blend together well (all the extra lines and dots).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2008/04/22/ntt-docomos-new-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-162983</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=4378#comment-162983</guid>
		<description>So are we supposed to type it &#039;docomo&#039; now instead of &#039;DoCoMo&#039;?

They should have just become Softbank&#039;s antithesis...

!=</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So are we supposed to type it &#8216;docomo&#8217; now instead of &#8216;DoCoMo&#8217;?</p>
<p>They should have just become Softbank&#8217;s antithesis&#8230;</p>
<p>!=</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph K</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2008/04/22/ntt-docomos-new-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-162877</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=4378#comment-162877</guid>
		<description>I find it kinda odd that the old logo was made without a branding division. Then I find it a bit odd that they only created a branding division &lt;i&gt;last year. A little late to the game for a major corporation...

From the press release:
&lt;i&gt;The changes are the result of DoCoMo&#039;s review of its branding and related marketing strategies after establishing the Corporate Branding Division in August 2007.&lt;/i&gt;

I don’t think the old logo worked so well, but BakaNewMexican is right at least in as much as he says at least the old one was distinct. I think the new one is an improvement juxtaposed against the old, but they’ve made a logo that looks mighty similar to a lot of other logos, which have been brought up here. If you don’t think it’s web 2.0, just compare it with xerox’s new logo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it kinda odd that the old logo was made without a branding division. Then I find it a bit odd that they only created a branding division <i>last year. A little late to the game for a major corporation&#8230;</p>
<p>From the press release:<br />
</i><i>The changes are the result of DoCoMo&#8217;s review of its branding and related marketing strategies after establishing the Corporate Branding Division in August 2007.</i></p>
<p>I don’t think the old logo worked so well, but BakaNewMexican is right at least in as much as he says at least the old one was distinct. I think the new one is an improvement juxtaposed against the old, but they’ve made a logo that looks mighty similar to a lot of other logos, which have been brought up here. If you don’t think it’s web 2.0, just compare it with xerox’s new logo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2008/04/22/ntt-docomos-new-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-162786</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=4378#comment-162786</guid>
		<description>Closely resembles the Conoco logo on gas stations. Kinda retro-looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Closely resembles the Conoco logo on gas stations. Kinda retro-looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VonSkippy</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2008/04/22/ntt-docomos-new-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-162729</link>
		<dc:creator>VonSkippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=4378#comment-162729</guid>
		<description>Not very Web 2.0-esque, since it&#039;s NOT glossy and there is NO reflection.

I&#039;m sure the parents of whatever child designed the new logo is very proud (of their child, not the logo).

On the bright side, I&#039;m sure it&#039;s worth the 5000 yen they paid for it.

And think of all the money they&#039;ll save by going with a single color logo when they print stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not very Web 2.0-esque, since it&#8217;s NOT glossy and there is NO reflection.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure the parents of whatever child designed the new logo is very proud (of their child, not the logo).</p>
<p>On the bright side, I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s worth the 5000 yen they paid for it.</p>
<p>And think of all the money they&#8217;ll save by going with a single color logo when they print stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aekutopia</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2008/04/22/ntt-docomos-new-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-162712</link>
		<dc:creator>Aekutopia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=4378#comment-162712</guid>
		<description>The new one is too simple.
The company&#039;s old president or executives might made a decision for this. 
Creativity from new generations still was controlled by some seniors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new one is too simple.<br />
The company&#8217;s old president or executives might made a decision for this.<br />
Creativity from new generations still was controlled by some seniors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BakaNewMexican</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2008/04/22/ntt-docomos-new-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-162705</link>
		<dc:creator>BakaNewMexican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=4378#comment-162705</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m underwhelmed.

The new logo for NTT DoCoMo is dull, boring, and uninspiring.

The old NTT DoCoMo logo was a masterpiece.  It has a certain panache that was distinctive and recognizable.  Qualities that the new logo severely lacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m underwhelmed.</p>
<p>The new logo for NTT DoCoMo is dull, boring, and uninspiring.</p>
<p>The old NTT DoCoMo logo was a masterpiece.  It has a certain panache that was distinctive and recognizable.  Qualities that the new logo severely lacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s not DoCoMo, it&#8217;s docomo</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2008/04/22/ntt-docomos-new-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-162696</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s not DoCoMo, it&#8217;s docomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=4378#comment-162696</guid>
		<description>[...] Via Jean Snow via Japan Probe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via Jean Snow via Japan Probe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me3</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2008/04/22/ntt-docomos-new-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-162693</link>
		<dc:creator>Me3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=4378#comment-162693</guid>
		<description>Oh snap, I know you di&#039;nt! :-)

The only solid advantage over the old one, I think, is that the old one was too busy, what with all the lines and such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh snap, I know you di&#8217;nt! <img src='http://www.japanprobe.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The only solid advantage over the old one, I think, is that the old one was too busy, what with all the lines and such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dakk</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2008/04/22/ntt-docomos-new-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-162682</link>
		<dc:creator>Dakk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=4378#comment-162682</guid>
		<description>I like the logo better when it said &quot;namco&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the logo better when it said &#8220;namco&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy H</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2008/04/22/ntt-docomos-new-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-162603</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=4378#comment-162603</guid>
		<description>The new one is more modern and subtle, whereas the old one is more recognisable to me.

I feel sorry for the poor chumps who have to replace the logo at the top of the Docomo tower in Shinjuku...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new one is more modern and subtle, whereas the old one is more recognisable to me.</p>
<p>I feel sorry for the poor chumps who have to replace the logo at the top of the Docomo tower in Shinjuku&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ダビ</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2008/04/22/ntt-docomos-new-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-162589</link>
		<dc:creator>ダビ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=4378#comment-162589</guid>
		<description>Neither is particularly inspiring...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neither is particularly inspiring&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfo</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2008/04/22/ntt-docomos-new-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-162581</link>
		<dc:creator>jfo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=4378#comment-162581</guid>
		<description>It looks like DoCoMo&#039;s logo went from New to Old O__O I like the new one..but it&#039;s nothing special. I wonder how much the guy got for designing the new simple one.... &gt;.&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like DoCoMo&#8217;s logo went from New to Old O__O I like the new one..but it&#8217;s nothing special. I wonder how much the guy got for designing the new simple one&#8230;. &gt;.&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
