Comments on: Eat Whale And Save The Planet

By: Syd

Syd — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:45:20 +0000

“You gotta nuke something”
-Nelson (The Simpsons)

By: parkmount

parkmount — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 05:48:31 +0000

I know Paul Watson of Greenpeace is a street bum from Canada he would do anything to make money.

By: The Overthinker

The Overthinker — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 05:43:29 +0000

No, that is unethical. I think zoos should all be vegetarian-only. We should only let lions and tigers and the like eat lettuce salads. It’s better for the environment.

By: parkmount

parkmount — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 05:40:20 +0000

That’s a good idea. Let’s me know when you got starved to death. We may be able to feed zoo animals with your meat.

By: parkmount

parkmount — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 05:36:06 +0000

I would eat only whale meats instead of beef, pork, chicken and lamb. The whale meat is so healthy and just like lean beef without BSE concern.

By: parkmount

parkmount — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 05:28:12 +0000

You want to keep whales in captive. That’s even more cruel. Aren’t you already happy to keep chickens, cows and sheep in concentration camp for slaughtering?

By: parkmount

parkmount — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 05:20:02 +0000

OK. So stop eating beef, chicken, lamb etc.

By: VonSkippy

VonSkippy — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 03:09:50 +0000

When you can raise whales from birth to slaughter weight in just two-three years, and raise MORE whales then you kill just like they do in cattle ranching, then I’d agree with you.

By: VonSkippy

VonSkippy — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 03:07:34 +0000

Rice? Corn? To name just a few.

By: parkmount

parkmount — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 02:36:28 +0000

I think Australia should ban cattle and sheep industries and grow grains in those emptied ranches. That also helps global warming.

By: parkmount

parkmount — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 02:23:35 +0000

Can we eat people with brain dead who come up with the idea like that?

I would feel less guilty of doing that at least to the ones in some sort of dead state than just older people.

By: morningstar

morningstar — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:51:30 +0000

Humans do not have to eat everything that MOVES.

By: Level3

Level3 — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:47:21 +0000

I thought eating whale made sense just because the meat from 1 whale would equal the meat from 100 cows (maybe more, maybe less)

Killing 1 animal vs. killing 100 animals?
Killing just 1 is the humane choice, of course!

It’s really sad that unemployed losers waste their lives on this silliness when HUMANS are dying across the world.

OH, BTW, are those Sea Shepherd ships solar powered? DO they use clean sailboats? No? Belching CO2 and leaking oil just like any other? What a shock…

By: Akoua Doffou

Akoua Doffou — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:48:25 +0000

Pink Floyd! xDD

By: parkmount

parkmount — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:33:21 +0000

I don’t understand what a fuss is all about whaling or eating for that matter.

They are not endangered species. Are they cute? Yes, they might be to some people.
So are the cows, chickens and sheep.

Are we only allowed to eat anything ugly?

Yes, you! The one reading this comment! Look in the mirror, How ugly are you? You have a big nose, flabby pinkish skin, a longer tongue and fatty torso with toothpick-like limbs. You don’t look pretty. Then again, I won’t eat you because you are too smelly, not because you are ugly. Hahaha.

By: helical

helical — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:45:20 +0000

My god … that’s a brilliant idea!

By: VonSkippy

VonSkippy — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:06:40 +0000

With faulty logic like “eat the whales, save the planet” I can’t wait to see their even lower carbon footprint idea “eat old people and solve two global problems at once”.

By: me

me — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:30:53 +0000

Screw you hippies. If you don’t eat your whale, you can’t have any pudding.

By: Ken

Ken — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:54:06 +0000

PR firms are really scraping the bottom of the barrel. This didn’t even get two seconds before the “whatever” light went off.

By: schmitts

schmitts — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:32:10 +0000

“Environmental group Greenpeace dismissed the survey, saying almost every kind of food was more climate friendly than meat.”

All the Greenpeace activists are vegetarians? They should protest against the destructive meet industry of Australia. GO!GO! Peter Garrett! But he is now quite contradictorily confused.

By: glo l

glo l — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:02:11 +0000

Even if more people consume whale meat, people will never cut down on beef, pork, lamb, etc.

By: The Overthinker

The Overthinker — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:20:50 +0000

This is a ridiculous comparison anyway. Whale only rates that as it’s not farmed or harvested in commercial quantities. It’s because cows and sheep don’t wander the land in sufficient numbers to feed us all that we have to expend the energy to grow them. How does whale compare against fishing (tuna, say) or subsistence hunting?

By: otsuka

otsuka — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 12:49:55 +0000

When the whales invade the mainland. I will run.