<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fukuda Praises Ex-Dictator Suharto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.japanprobe.com/2008/01/28/fukuda-praises-ex-dictator-suharto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2008/01/28/fukuda-praises-ex-dictator-suharto/</link>
	<description>Japan News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: idarmadi</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2008/01/28/fukuda-praises-ex-dictator-suharto/comment-page-1/#comment-133186</link>
		<dc:creator>idarmadi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=3668#comment-133186</guid>
		<description>Dictator?  I think it&#039;s a little bit exagerated. I&#039;m not quite a Soeharto fanboy, but to put things in a lot of Indonesians&#039; perspective, live were much easier (especially for the poor) in his era.  Sure he has his own &#039;democracy&#039; style, which will jail and/or vanished some radical oposition or ppls that didn&#039;t agree with him, but on the other end, that&#039;s provide quite a stability needed for country development.
His faults that leaded to his downfall were that he couldn&#039;t control his cronies (which corrupt), and he believed IMF (which causes one of the biggest banks robbery in the history of human kind).
After Soeharto, we had 4 presidents, but live is also harder for the poor (things are more more expensive).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dictator?  I think it&#8217;s a little bit exagerated. I&#8217;m not quite a Soeharto fanboy, but to put things in a lot of Indonesians&#8217; perspective, live were much easier (especially for the poor) in his era.  Sure he has his own &#8216;democracy&#8217; style, which will jail and/or vanished some radical oposition or ppls that didn&#8217;t agree with him, but on the other end, that&#8217;s provide quite a stability needed for country development.<br />
His faults that leaded to his downfall were that he couldn&#8217;t control his cronies (which corrupt), and he believed IMF (which causes one of the biggest banks robbery in the history of human kind).<br />
After Soeharto, we had 4 presidents, but live is also harder for the poor (things are more more expensive).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

