<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti-Sea Of Japan Advertisements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.japanprobe.com/2007/08/23/anti-sea-of-japan-advertisements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2007/08/23/anti-sea-of-japan-advertisements/</link>
	<description>Japan News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Pan</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2007/08/23/anti-sea-of-japan-advertisements/comment-page-1/#comment-79218</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Pan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 07:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=2593#comment-79218</guid>
		<description>A while ago I got an email asking for help translating a page about the East Sea/Sea of Japan debate from a group supporting the name The Sea of Japan.  I didn&#039;t have the time to help them out, but I did &lt;a href=&quot;http://higashiajia.wordpress.com/2007/05/24/saveseaofjapancom-%e3%81%8b%e3%82%89%e3%81%ae%e7%bf%bb%e8%a8%b3%e4%be%9d%e9%a0%bc/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;post their info on my Japanese blog for anyone that wanted to help them to translate it.&lt;/a&gt; It looks like they still haven&#039;t found a translator, so if anyone is interested you can contact them on their page.

http://saveseaofjapan.com/english/

Personally I think it&#039;s a rather silly issue for Korea to be getting so excited about since changing the name either way doesn&#039;t really mean anything since it&#039;s just a name.  I don&#039;t think it should be changed just because Korea wants it to be changed, they need some evidence to make the entire world change their maps, so I&#039;m glad to see someone making noise about the issue beyond the traditional Korean net-terrorists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A while ago I got an email asking for help translating a page about the East Sea/Sea of Japan debate from a group supporting the name The Sea of Japan.  I didn&#8217;t have the time to help them out, but I did <a href="http://higashiajia.wordpress.com/2007/05/24/saveseaofjapancom-%e3%81%8b%e3%82%89%e3%81%ae%e7%bf%bb%e8%a8%b3%e4%be%9d%e9%a0%bc/" rel="nofollow">post their info on my Japanese blog for anyone that wanted to help them to translate it.</a> It looks like they still haven&#8217;t found a translator, so if anyone is interested you can contact them on their page.</p>
<p><a href="http://saveseaofjapan.com/english/" rel="nofollow">http://saveseaofjapan.com/english/</a></p>
<p>Personally I think it&#8217;s a rather silly issue for Korea to be getting so excited about since changing the name either way doesn&#8217;t really mean anything since it&#8217;s just a name.  I don&#8217;t think it should be changed just because Korea wants it to be changed, they need some evidence to make the entire world change their maps, so I&#8217;m glad to see someone making noise about the issue beyond the traditional Korean net-terrorists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: East Sea Controversy Goes to Google Ads at ROK Drop</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2007/08/23/anti-sea-of-japan-advertisements/comment-page-1/#comment-78663</link>
		<dc:creator>East Sea Controversy Goes to Google Ads at ROK Drop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 04:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=2593#comment-78663</guid>
		<description>[...] Japan Probe is reporting that the war over &quot; The Sea that Cannot Be Named&quot; has a new front, Google Ads: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Japan Probe is reporting that the war over &quot; The Sea that Cannot Be Named&quot; has a new front, Google Ads: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the overthinker</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2007/08/23/anti-sea-of-japan-advertisements/comment-page-1/#comment-78564</link>
		<dc:creator>the overthinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=2593#comment-78564</guid>
		<description>Perfectly legitimate way. Much more logical than &quot;East Sea&quot;, which is on my west coast at the moment.... 

If you want to know more than you ever wanted to know about the Japan Sea debacle (barely a debate) then see the series of posts over at www.occidentalism.org by Gerry Bevers, a teacher at a Korean university who got fired for writing stuff about Takeshima that his Korean employees did not like. He has a lot of stuff of SOJ as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfectly legitimate way. Much more logical than &#8220;East Sea&#8221;, which is on my west coast at the moment&#8230;. </p>
<p>If you want to know more than you ever wanted to know about the Japan Sea debacle (barely a debate) then see the series of posts over at <a href="http://www.occidentalism.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.occidentalism.org</a> by Gerry Bevers, a teacher at a Korean university who got fired for writing stuff about Takeshima that his Korean employees did not like. He has a lot of stuff of SOJ as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get a Job, Son!</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2007/08/23/anti-sea-of-japan-advertisements/comment-page-1/#comment-78495</link>
		<dc:creator>Get a Job, Son!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 04:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=2593#comment-78495</guid>
		<description>A small question for those anti-&quot;Sea of Japan&quot;...
If the Japanese islands weren&#039;t there (to &#039;enlcose&#039; the sea) what would the East Sea be then?

Nothing, other than the Pacific Ocean.

...or is that a too simplistic way of deciding the name?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A small question for those anti-&#8221;Sea of Japan&#8221;&#8230;<br />
If the Japanese islands weren&#8217;t there (to &#8216;enlcose&#8217; the sea) what would the East Sea be then?</p>
<p>Nothing, other than the Pacific Ocean.</p>
<p>&#8230;or is that a too simplistic way of deciding the name?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shazzb0t</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2007/08/23/anti-sea-of-japan-advertisements/comment-page-1/#comment-78442</link>
		<dc:creator>shazzb0t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=2593#comment-78442</guid>
		<description>Typical anti-Japan rhetoric. Meh. Good job James.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typical anti-Japan rhetoric. Meh. Good job James.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

