Comments on: Japan’s film rating body rejects the title “The Assassination of Bush”

By: The Overthinker

The Overthinker — Sun, 04 Nov 2007 03:50:05 +0000

It is one thing to avoid the movie, another to avoid its title. Disney’s “The Hunchback of Notre Dame” had its title changed in Japan as well, to “The Bells of Notre Dame” (a change I approve of, since the film was not exactly Victor Hugo’s story). This is because the word “hunchback” is considered an offensive word and not to be broadcast. And many many other movies also get their titles changed for various reasons – “The Karate Kid” becomes “Best Kid”, anything with Leslie Nielson in it is “The Man with the Naked” Something. “Memoirs of a Geisha” becomes “Sayuri”. Conversely, Disney changed the name of Miyazaki’s “Tenkuu no Shiro Laputa” as Laputa (la puta) is the Spanish for “whore” and while accurate to Swift’s original name for the floating island, would not make Disney popular among the Spanish-speaking section of the US.

By: John P.

John P. — Sun, 04 Nov 2007 03:23:59 +0000

The title should be whatever it’s creator of the movie wants it to be. Censoring, or changing it is kinda lame. People don’t have to watch it if they are offended. After-All, it’s just a lame movie.

By: a.erol

a.erol — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:30:59 +0000

I don’t know their your libel laws, but Bush is free to pass laws for “killing of all humans living on a -specified- zone (this zone was Hiroshima in the past, and is Iraq today)”. Change your laws to punish the killers, not the victims!

By: Transpacific Triangle » links for 2007-05-18 by Graham Webster

Transpacific Triangle » links for 2007-05-18 by Graham Webster — Fri, 18 May 2007 07:21:39 +0000

[...] Japan’s film rating body rejects the title “The Assassination of Bush” » Japan Probe [...]

By: James

James — Fri, 18 May 2007 07:18:54 +0000

Was that a business decision aimed at not offending potential viewers/theaters, or was it an order from a film rating body?

By: Ken Y-N

Ken Y-N — Fri, 18 May 2007 07:15:37 +0000

feitclub: Japanese libel laws are anything but strict, especially from a punishment point of view – the weeklies treat it as just another cost of running their business as defamation sells more magazines than they are likely to get fined for the libel.

Oh, and for those of you complaining about the title change, I seem to remember when the USA distributors changed the title of “The Pope must Die” to “…Diet”.

By: Jamie

Jamie — Fri, 18 May 2007 06:18:55 +0000

I’m sorry, Mike, but that’s just silly. No one must respect anything. When you are required to respect something, it no longer deserves respect. And when a government body ….

Bah! It makes me so angry!

I don’t care.

By: feitclub

feitclub — Fri, 18 May 2007 03:45:54 +0000

I think you’re onto something. Japanese libel/slander laws (they don’t distinguish between the two) are very strict, so a movie called “The Assasination of Bush” could be seen as detrimental to the character/reputation of George W. Bush, while at the same time a more generic title might be acceptable.

However, I think other posters ask the better question: Why exhibit the film at all in Japan?

By: Kazen

Kazen — Fri, 18 May 2007 03:27:41 +0000

Maybe it has something to do with Japan’s crazy libel laws? Maybe in some weird way the movie is protected, but the title is not?

By: the overthinker

the overthinker — Fri, 18 May 2007 01:48:36 +0000

If it’s so important to respect the position of the leader, no matter if you don’t like him or his policies, then why did the American colonists ever rebel?

Could they call the film “Daitouryou Ansatsu” perhaps? I think this is more about not wanting to rock the boat with perceived American media attention, say from worries that it will be popular (CNN News: “The film “Kill Bush” has opened in Japan to record numbers. Pundits say this popularity is yet another sign that Japan is tilting to the right, and will soon invade China again. Pearl Harbour is on standby alert.”)

By: Dave

Dave — Fri, 18 May 2007 01:41:37 +0000

I can understand where they’re coming from, but under that logic, the movie shouldn’t air either. Either the whole thing, or nothing IMO.

By: wes

wes — Thu, 17 May 2007 23:45:09 +0000

but then why not ban the film outright?

By: Mike

Mike — Thu, 17 May 2007 22:41:01 +0000

They are not protecting the public from inappropriate film titles, but rather respecting the position on the President of the United States. Kind of the same way that you do not call your mother a B*tch. You must respect the position, whether you agree with the person or not.

By: Jamie

Jamie — Thu, 17 May 2007 22:10:09 +0000

I’m speechless. Who the f-

No. Not worth it. Typical actions of a two-bit dictatorship.