<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick links: October 29, 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.japanprobe.com/2006/10/29/quick-links-october-29-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2006/10/29/quick-links-october-29-2006/</link>
	<description>Japan News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: yrs</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2006/10/29/quick-links-october-29-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-2732</link>
		<dc:creator>yrs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=653#comment-2732</guid>
		<description>http://dir.salon.com/story/ent/feature/2005/04/09/geisha/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dir.salon.com/story/ent/feature/2005/04/09/geisha/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://dir.salon.com/story/ent/feature/2005/04/09/geisha/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedant</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2006/10/29/quick-links-october-29-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-2691</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 19:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=653#comment-2691</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And, if i’m not mistaken, they were all away from the front lines!&lt;/blockquote&gt;
You are in fact mistaken. Not only were many medical personnel who had to go to the frontlines to carry out their duties, but many of those black marines carrying out menial tasks were eventually pressed into frontline fighting anyway. The controversy may be &quot;stupid&quot;, but it&#039;s not because blacks didn&#039;t fight on Iwo Jima.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And, if i’m not mistaken, they were all away from the front lines!</p></blockquote>
<p>You are in fact mistaken. Not only were many medical personnel who had to go to the frontlines to carry out their duties, but many of those black marines carrying out menial tasks were eventually pressed into frontline fighting anyway. The controversy may be &#8220;stupid&#8221;, but it&#8217;s not because blacks didn&#8217;t fight on Iwo Jima.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madne0</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2006/10/29/quick-links-october-29-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-2690</link>
		<dc:creator>madne0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 17:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=653#comment-2690</guid>
		<description>&quot;Despite the fact that 900 African Americans fought in the battle of Iwo Jima, you won’t find any of them in Clint Eastwood’s new film.&quot;

Of all the stupid controversies, this one is the worse. According to wikipedia almost 80 thousand marines fought in Iwo Jima. So, just over 1% were black. And, if i&#039;m not mistaken, they were all away from the front lines! 
So, would showing Black marines be a nice nod to the (undeniable) role that they played in Iwo Jima? Sure! Is it scandalous that they aren&#039;t showned? I don&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Despite the fact that 900 African Americans fought in the battle of Iwo Jima, you won’t find any of them in Clint Eastwood’s new film.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of all the stupid controversies, this one is the worse. According to wikipedia almost 80 thousand marines fought in Iwo Jima. So, just over 1% were black. And, if i&#8217;m not mistaken, they were all away from the front lines!<br />
So, would showing Black marines be a nice nod to the (undeniable) role that they played in Iwo Jima? Sure! Is it scandalous that they aren&#8217;t showned? I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GRY</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2006/10/29/quick-links-october-29-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-2685</link>
		<dc:creator>GRY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 15:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=653#comment-2685</guid>
		<description>Great site! Just quibbling, but I think you&#039;re missing a zero in the dollar-denominated price you give for the gold calendar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great site! Just quibbling, but I think you&#8217;re missing a zero in the dollar-denominated price you give for the gold calendar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swifty</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2006/10/29/quick-links-october-29-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-2680</link>
		<dc:creator>Swifty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 09:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=653#comment-2680</guid>
		<description>Thanks! The honour of gyaru will be preserved!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! The honour of gyaru will be preserved!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

