<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Japan will not oppose Ban Ki-moon&#8217;s bid to become the next UN Secretary General: a bad idea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.japanprobe.com/2006/10/03/japan-will-not-oppose-ban-ki-moons-bid-to-become-the-next-un-secretary-general-a-bad-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2006/10/03/japan-will-not-oppose-ban-ki-moons-bid-to-become-the-next-un-secretary-general-a-bad-idea/</link>
	<description>Japan News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: concerned Filipino</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2006/10/03/japan-will-not-oppose-ban-ki-moons-bid-to-become-the-next-un-secretary-general-a-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-83129</link>
		<dc:creator>concerned Filipino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=569#comment-83129</guid>
		<description>And I guess instead of the UN, what the world should have is the benevolent, altruistic, selfless rule of the United States, possibly supported by Japan, the two largest economies in the world.

Give me a break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I guess instead of the UN, what the world should have is the benevolent, altruistic, selfless rule of the United States, possibly supported by Japan, the two largest economies in the world.</p>
<p>Give me a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: concerned Filipino</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2006/10/03/japan-will-not-oppose-ban-ki-moons-bid-to-become-the-next-un-secretary-general-a-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-83120</link>
		<dc:creator>concerned Filipino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=569#comment-83120</guid>
		<description>And what&#039;s wrong with a &quot;nationalism-focused&quot; foreign policy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what&#8217;s wrong with a &#8220;nationalism-focused&#8221; foreign policy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James (admin)</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2006/10/03/japan-will-not-oppose-ban-ki-moons-bid-to-become-the-next-un-secretary-general-a-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-2449</link>
		<dc:creator>James (admin)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=569#comment-2449</guid>
		<description>HL:

Please show me an official statement by a Japanese Prime Minister/Government Ministry that says war criminals are heroes.  Please show me actual quotes from widely used textbooks that &quot;fudge history&quot;.  I&#039;ve been trying to find some of these for some time, and I have yet to locate any.

As for the visits to yasukuni, you must be getting your information from a somewhat skewed source.  Politicians are not visiting yasukuni on August 15th because it is Korea&#039;s national day:  August 15th is the anniversary of the end of World War II, which would make it the most appropriate day to pray for the millions of war dead enshrined there.  When  Koizumi visited the shrine on August 15th 2006, he stated that he was praying for peace to express that war should not be repeated, and to mourn the war dead.  The Japanese government has officially apologized many times for the war and has paid hundreds of millions of dollars in reparations to China and South Korea.  

Here&#039;s a recent example of what those history fudging prime ministers are saying:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20548015-23109,00.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HL:</p>
<p>Please show me an official statement by a Japanese Prime Minister/Government Ministry that says war criminals are heroes.  Please show me actual quotes from widely used textbooks that &#8220;fudge history&#8221;.  I&#8217;ve been trying to find some of these for some time, and I have yet to locate any.</p>
<p>As for the visits to yasukuni, you must be getting your information from a somewhat skewed source.  Politicians are not visiting yasukuni on August 15th because it is Korea&#8217;s national day:  August 15th is the anniversary of the end of World War II, which would make it the most appropriate day to pray for the millions of war dead enshrined there.  When  Koizumi visited the shrine on August 15th 2006, he stated that he was praying for peace to express that war should not be repeated, and to mourn the war dead.  The Japanese government has officially apologized many times for the war and has paid hundreds of millions of dollars in reparations to China and South Korea.  </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a recent example of what those history fudging prime ministers are saying:<br />
<a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20548015-23109,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20548015-23109,00.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HL</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2006/10/03/japan-will-not-oppose-ban-ki-moons-bid-to-become-the-next-un-secretary-general-a-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-2447</link>
		<dc:creator>HL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=569#comment-2447</guid>
		<description>all your talk about anti-japanese extremism is laughable. unlike germany, japan has not fully expressed regret or acknowledgement. the hard-liners in japan are ridiculous, claiming the war criminals are heroes. the japanese started a war with several countries and had tortured, enslaved and killed many civilians. is it wrong for other countries to be upset when it japan&#039;s history in this respect is being fudged in textbooks and visits (on national days when they could go other days if they wish) are made by politicians to yasukuni?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all your talk about anti-japanese extremism is laughable. unlike germany, japan has not fully expressed regret or acknowledgement. the hard-liners in japan are ridiculous, claiming the war criminals are heroes. the japanese started a war with several countries and had tortured, enslaved and killed many civilians. is it wrong for other countries to be upset when it japan&#8217;s history in this respect is being fudged in textbooks and visits (on national days when they could go other days if they wish) are made by politicians to yasukuni?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2006/10/03/japan-will-not-oppose-ban-ki-moons-bid-to-become-the-next-un-secretary-general-a-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-2408</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 16:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=569#comment-2408</guid>
		<description>James,

US-Korea relations have been the worst too since Korean war such as the allied army command right return conflict and so on. Why doesn&#039;t your country decline Ban Ki-moon?

By the way, do you know Korea is bankrupting now? Western investers evacuated and trade balance has turned over. I predict Korea will declare default in the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,</p>
<p>US-Korea relations have been the worst too since Korean war such as the allied army command right return conflict and so on. Why doesn&#8217;t your country decline Ban Ki-moon?</p>
<p>By the way, do you know Korea is bankrupting now? Western investers evacuated and trade balance has turned over. I predict Korea will declare default in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darin</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2006/10/03/japan-will-not-oppose-ban-ki-moons-bid-to-become-the-next-un-secretary-general-a-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-2387</link>
		<dc:creator>Darin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 07:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=569#comment-2387</guid>
		<description>James also hasn&#039;t written anything positive about Japan either.  Does that mean he hates Japan too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James also hasn&#8217;t written anything positive about Japan either.  Does that mean he hates Japan too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James (admin)</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2006/10/03/japan-will-not-oppose-ban-ki-moons-bid-to-become-the-next-un-secretary-general-a-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-2385</link>
		<dc:creator>James (admin)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 06:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=569#comment-2385</guid>
		<description>junosora:

This is a Japan blog, so if I&#039;m going to write about Korea, it&#039;s in a Japan-related context.   If I write about Korea, I try to stick to foreign policy issues, since I don&#039;t speak or read Korean, nor do I know much about Korean culture.  Since Japan-Korea relations have been far from friendly recently, it&#039;s doubtful that I&#039;ll be writing many positive things about Korea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>junosora:</p>
<p>This is a Japan blog, so if I&#8217;m going to write about Korea, it&#8217;s in a Japan-related context.   If I write about Korea, I try to stick to foreign policy issues, since I don&#8217;t speak or read Korean, nor do I know much about Korean culture.  Since Japan-Korea relations have been far from friendly recently, it&#8217;s doubtful that I&#8217;ll be writing many positive things about Korea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: junosora</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2006/10/03/japan-will-not-oppose-ban-ki-moons-bid-to-become-the-next-un-secretary-general-a-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-2382</link>
		<dc:creator>junosora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 04:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=569#comment-2382</guid>
		<description>James,

perhaps i was hasty in making the assumption that you hate korea... but let&#039;s be honest.  you really don&#039;t have a single post since you started this blog that says anything positive about korea.  

and no, it&#039;s not wrong to oppose a regime like roh&#039;s.  i personally don&#039;t like uri party either.  

just glad to know now that you don&#039;t hate korea, just the administration.  i&#039;m with you on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,</p>
<p>perhaps i was hasty in making the assumption that you hate korea&#8230; but let&#8217;s be honest.  you really don&#8217;t have a single post since you started this blog that says anything positive about korea.  </p>
<p>and no, it&#8217;s not wrong to oppose a regime like roh&#8217;s.  i personally don&#8217;t like uri party either.  </p>
<p>just glad to know now that you don&#8217;t hate korea, just the administration.  i&#8217;m with you on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ponta</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2006/10/03/japan-will-not-oppose-ban-ki-moons-bid-to-become-the-next-un-secretary-general-a-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-2379</link>
		<dc:creator>Ponta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 19:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=569#comment-2379</guid>
		<description>I am curious if Korean media would report it.
I didn&#039;t see &lt;a href=&quot;http://foreigndispatches.typepad.com/dispatches/2006/08/no_thanks_for_a.html#trackback&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this &lt;/a&gt; was reported in Korean media.
Japan has been willing to mend the rift , at least from the time Japan concluded treaty on Basic Relations in 1965. For some reason Korea has rejected its will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am curious if Korean media would report it.<br />
I didn&#8217;t see <a href="http://foreigndispatches.typepad.com/dispatches/2006/08/no_thanks_for_a.html#trackback" rel="nofollow">this </a> was reported in Korean media.<br />
Japan has been willing to mend the rift , at least from the time Japan concluded treaty on Basic Relations in 1965. For some reason Korea has rejected its will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James (admin)</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2006/10/03/japan-will-not-oppose-ban-ki-moons-bid-to-become-the-next-un-secretary-general-a-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-2375</link>
		<dc:creator>James (admin)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 08:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=569#comment-2375</guid>
		<description>junosora:

Since I dislike Ban Ki-Moon, a member of the current Roh Administration, who has participated in that administration&#039;s active encouragement and exploitation of anti-Japanese sentiment, I hate Korea?

Is it so wrong to oppose South Korea&#039;s nationalism-focused foreign policy?  Should I be writing a post praising the members of the Roh Administration for trying to convince the South Korean people that Japan is the biggest threat to their nation&#039;s security?  

I can understand Japan&#039;s desire to show good faith about this issue, and it will probably make the South Korean government tone down it&#039;s anti-Japanese rage a little bit, at least in the short term.  However, I think that the election of an UN Secretary general who came from one of the most anti-Japanese/anti-American South Korean administrations in recent history is not a good thing for Japan or the United States( my country).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>junosora:</p>
<p>Since I dislike Ban Ki-Moon, a member of the current Roh Administration, who has participated in that administration&#8217;s active encouragement and exploitation of anti-Japanese sentiment, I hate Korea?</p>
<p>Is it so wrong to oppose South Korea&#8217;s nationalism-focused foreign policy?  Should I be writing a post praising the members of the Roh Administration for trying to convince the South Korean people that Japan is the biggest threat to their nation&#8217;s security?  </p>
<p>I can understand Japan&#8217;s desire to show good faith about this issue, and it will probably make the South Korean government tone down it&#8217;s anti-Japanese rage a little bit, at least in the short term.  However, I think that the election of an UN Secretary general who came from one of the most anti-Japanese/anti-American South Korean administrations in recent history is not a good thing for Japan or the United States( my country).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: junosora</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2006/10/03/japan-will-not-oppose-ban-ki-moons-bid-to-become-the-next-un-secretary-general-a-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-2374</link>
		<dc:creator>junosora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 08:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=569#comment-2374</guid>
		<description>curious... why do you hate korea so much?

i personally think it&#039;s great that japan is being diplomatic and gracious enough to not want to block Ban&#039;s nomination.  if anything, maybe this will show korea that japan is willing to mend the rift that has been happening.  

diplomacy requires sacrifices.  with japan&#039;s good move, now the ball&#039;s in korea&#039;s court for them to return the good will and good faith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>curious&#8230; why do you hate korea so much?</p>
<p>i personally think it&#8217;s great that japan is being diplomatic and gracious enough to not want to block Ban&#8217;s nomination.  if anything, maybe this will show korea that japan is willing to mend the rift that has been happening.  </p>
<p>diplomacy requires sacrifices.  with japan&#8217;s good move, now the ball&#8217;s in korea&#8217;s court for them to return the good will and good faith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julián Ortega Martínez</title>
		<link>http://www.japanprobe.com/2006/10/03/japan-will-not-oppose-ban-ki-moons-bid-to-become-the-next-un-secretary-general-a-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-2359</link>
		<dc:creator>Julián Ortega Martínez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=569#comment-2359</guid>
		<description>So the UN is doomed... Just when we thought it was going to be better than with Annan... (remember the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Category:Oil-for-Food_Programme&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Oil for Food scandal&lt;/a&gt;?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the UN is doomed&#8230; Just when we thought it was going to be better than with Annan&#8230; (remember the <a href="http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Category:Oil-for-Food_Programme" rel="nofollow">Oil for Food scandal</a>?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

