JapanProbe Friends - Featured Members


Defending the ‘Sea of Japan’ from Korean ultra-nationalist propaganda

July 15th, 2006 by James

It looks like Japan is striking out against the Korean ultra-nationalist campaign to change the name of the ‘Sea of Japan’ to ‘East Sea’ (A Korea-centric term). A series of videos in English, which appear to have been created by the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, tear apart the Korean ultra-nationalist agruments by presenting hard evidence to support the fact that the name ‘Sea of Japan’ is not a biproduct of Japanese imperialism.

The Video is divided into 3 sections:

Part 1: What is the issue regarding the name “Sea of Japan”? A brief introduction of the dispute. [Watch it here]

Part 2: History of the name “Sea of Japan”. This section clearly demonstrates that widespread international usage of the name “Sea of Japan” began in a period when Japan was still an isolated feudal state. [Watch it here]

Part 3: Officially recognized by international organizations. This section shows how major international organizations, such as the UN, have rejected usage of the term “East Sea”. [Watch it here]

I’m glad to see the Japanese government is fighting back against the attempts of the ultra-nationalist Korean group VANK, which has been spamming every foreign map maker with pro-”East Sea” e-mails. Unlike VANK’s mailings, the Japanese MOFA actually presents evidence to support its well-established claim. The three studies cited in part 2 of the video are particularly strong:

A study of old maps in France reveal that “Sea of Japan” had become the established term by the early 19th century (Japan did not end its isolation until the 1850’s).

A study of maps held in the United States Library of Congress also reveals that “Sea of Japan” was historically established well before Japan’s 20th century imperialism.

Cambridge’s holdings also seem to support this conclusion.

Are you convinced yet? Sadly, with each passing day, Korean ultra-nationalists are using their propaganda to convince the international community that the “Sea of Japan” is somehow an evil imperialist term. The fact that the Japanese government had to make a video defending the name usage shows the severity of the problem. I’m not sure how Japan will be able to win this argument without resorting to a counter-spam campaign aimed at getting companies that have adopted the usage of “East Sea” (under pressure from Korean spammers) to switch back to “Sea of Japan”.

Update: Korean commercial [in English] celebrates the “East Sea” spam campaign

Occidentalism has posted a link to a Korea Telecom commercial that celebrates the role of internet in Korea’s campaign to remove “Sea of Japan” from the world’s maps. I especially love the part near the end, when “Sea of Japan” is erased from a map and replaced with “East Sea”, finally teaching white children proper Korea-centric geographical names!
Here are some links about the Korean campaign to discredit the “Sea of Japan”:

Wikipedia: Sea of Japan Naming Dispute

Occidentalism: Google Earth adopts usage “East Sea”, then switches dual usage of “East Sea”/”Sea of Japan”

About.com: How VANK’s spam letter campaign made About.com switch its maps to say “East Sea”

VANK Homepage: Ultra-nationalist “East Sea” propaganda in English
Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs Homepage: Sea of Japan



Related Posts:
 

Korean ultra-nationalist group pays for New York Times advertisement about Sea of Japan

Dokdo Perfume – smelly Korean nationalism

Korean ultra-nationalists angry at the UN’s latest map

Chinese Ultra-Nationalist Website Warns Japan: No Torch Protests

SEA OF JAPAN. Get it?


RSS feed | Trackback URI

11 Comments »

Comment by Dae Han Min Guk
2006-07-15 18:45:25

Yer obviously a Korea hater, or you’d admit what every sensible person knows – Korea is the center of the world, and that’s why it should be called the East Sea! ;-)

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

 
Comment by Dae Han Min Guk
2006-07-15 18:45:25

Yer obviously a Korea hater, or you’d admit what every sensible person knows – Korea is the center of the world, and that’s why it should be called the East Sea! ;-)

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

 
Comment by Roppongi
2006-07-15 21:30:37

–_– It seems this blog is just turning into another Occidentalism. Boo on that.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

 
Comment by Roppongi
2006-07-15 21:30:37

–_– It seems this blog is just turning into another Occidentalism. Boo on that.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

 
Comment by Dae Han Min Guk
2006-07-15 21:33:51

–_– It seems this blog is just turning into another Occidentalism. Boo on that.

Eh? Whose fault is it that Korea keeps providing so much absurdist raw material to write about? You might as well condemn The Marmot’s Hole while you’re at it, ’cause these things get written about at least as often there.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

 
Comment by Dae Han Min Guk
2006-07-15 21:33:51

–_– It seems this blog is just turning into another Occidentalism. Boo on that.

Eh? Whose fault is it that Korea keeps providing so much absurdist raw material to write about? You might as well condemn The Marmot’s Hole while you’re at it, ’cause these things get written about at least as often there.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

 
Comment by zaykim
2006-07-16 22:10:05

well, japs made a promotion video and stupid westerners have bought it as they buy Sony cameras. You can argue it but truth does not change. What koreans do not know is that world is more keen on Japan than Korea. But if you want to know the TRUTH, check out the below link. Westerners should grow up out of narrow view into Far East asia through a ‘peep hole’ called Japan. Japan was the last one up in Far East asia and the first one to accept westernised modernism. Nothing more than that.

http://www.prkorea.com/english/eastsea.html

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Comment by Brian
2009-04-22 16:10:41

They were also, more or less, the only country to modernize hardly at all until the mid 20th century, continue to be the most technologically advanced, and they do not bitch every everything under the sun unlike China and Korea.

Japan is simply a lot easier to deal with and they don’t get angry about everything. They simply have more civility when it comes to getting their point across, which is why the west deals well with them.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

 
 
Comment by zaykim
2006-07-16 22:10:05

well, japs made a promotion video and stupid westerners have bought it as they buy Sony cameras. You can argue it but truth does not change. What koreans do not know is that world is more keen on Japan than Korea. But if you want to know the TRUTH, check out the below link. Westerners should grow up out of narrow view into Far East asia through a ‘peep hole’ called Japan. Japan was the last one up in Far East asia and the first one to accept westernised modernism. Nothing more than that.

http://www.prkorea.com/english/eastsea.html

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Comment by Brian
2009-04-22 16:10:41

They were also, more or less, the only country to modernize hardly at all until the mid 20th century, continue to be the most technologically advanced, and they do not bitch every everything under the sun unlike China and Korea.

Japan is simply a lot easier to deal with and they don’t get angry about everything. They simply have more civility when it comes to getting their point across, which is why the west deals well with them.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

 
 
Comment by James (admin)
2006-07-16 23:26:33

zaykim,

Did you actually watch the Japanese-produced video? What do you think of the map studies they cite?

All of the aforementioned maps prove that the East Sea was widely known as the “Sea of Korea” during the 17th and 18th centuries.

However, since the East Sea was referred to as the “Sea of Japan” in La Perouse’s map of 1797, maps produced thereafter in Europe began to use the term “Sea of Japan” with greater frequency. However, both “Sea of Korea” and “Sea of Japan” co-existed until the first half of the 19th century. It is difficult to find out how “Sea of Japan” replaced “Sea of Korea” in the later half of the 19th century because a review of all existing ancient maps has not been completed. However, it is believed that such a replacement was a reflection of the easier availability of information about Japan than Korea as Japan’s military power had expanded and the recognition of Japan had increased in the international community.

The evidence in this argument is incredibly weak and does not hold up against the studies of French, American, and British antique map collections conducted by Japanese scholars. That Korean page seems to ignore the fact that over 90% of western maps were using the term “Sea of Japan” well before Japan opened to the world and increased its military power.

In the early 20th century while Korea was under the colonial rule of Japan, the name East Sea was eradicated from the maps of world. The eradication of references to the East Sea started when a resolution was adopted at the first Conference of the International Hydrographic Organization t establish the limits of oceans and seas and attach appropriate local names for safe navigation. A Japanese delegation attended this conference, but there was no Korean delegation. According to the resolution, the East Sea was registered by Japan as the “Sea of Japan” in 1923. No other member country raised any objection. Consequently, the 1929 Monaco Conference adopted a resolution to publish Special Publication No.23 entitled The Limits of Oceans and Seas, which was based on data collected previously, and to make this publication an internationally accepted document. Thereafter, the mapmakers of the world used the standardized names of places based on this publication and the name “East Sea” lost its place on world maps.

Even if Korea had not been under Japanese colonial domination during the 1929 Monaco Conference, what makes you think that a free Korea could have forced all the major western powers, which had been using the name “Sea of Japan” [in accordance with geographical naming conventions commonly used in Europe] since the early 19th century, to change their maps to say “East Sea” or “Korea Sea”?

If you actually believe the link you posted somehow refutes the argument the Japanese have presented, you are the one who should “grow up” out of a narrow-minded worldview.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

 
Comment by James (admin)
2006-07-16 23:26:33

zaykim,

Did you actually watch the Japanese-produced video? What do you think of the map studies they cite?

All of the aforementioned maps prove that the East Sea was widely known as the “Sea of Korea” during the 17th and 18th centuries.

However, since the East Sea was referred to as the “Sea of Japan” in La Perouse’s map of 1797, maps produced thereafter in Europe began to use the term “Sea of Japan” with greater frequency. However, both “Sea of Korea” and “Sea of Japan” co-existed until the first half of the 19th century. It is difficult to find out how “Sea of Japan” replaced “Sea of Korea” in the later half of the 19th century because a review of all existing ancient maps has not been completed. However, it is believed that such a replacement was a reflection of the easier availability of information about Japan than Korea as Japan’s military power had expanded and the recognition of Japan had increased in the international community.

The evidence in this argument is incredibly weak and does not hold up against the studies of French, American, and British antique map collections conducted by Japanese scholars. That Korean page seems to ignore the fact that over 90% of western maps were using the term “Sea of Japan” well before Japan opened to the world and increased its military power.

In the early 20th century while Korea was under the colonial rule of Japan, the name East Sea was eradicated from the maps of world. The eradication of references to the East Sea started when a resolution was adopted at the first Conference of the International Hydrographic Organization t establish the limits of oceans and seas and attach appropriate local names for safe navigation. A Japanese delegation attended this conference, but there was no Korean delegation. According to the resolution, the East Sea was registered by Japan as the “Sea of Japan” in 1923. No other member country raised any objection. Consequently, the 1929 Monaco Conference adopted a resolution to publish Special Publication No.23 entitled The Limits of Oceans and Seas, which was based on data collected previously, and to make this publication an internationally accepted document. Thereafter, the mapmakers of the world used the standardized names of places based on this publication and the name “East Sea” lost its place on world maps.

Even if Korea had not been under Japanese colonial domination during the 1929 Monaco Conference, what makes you think that a free Korea could have forced all the major western powers, which had been using the name “Sea of Japan” [in accordance with geographical naming conventions commonly used in Europe] since the early 19th century, to change their maps to say “East Sea” or “Korea Sea”?

If you actually believe the link you posted somehow refutes the argument the Japanese have presented, you are the one who should “grow up” out of a narrow-minded worldview.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment. (Please close your HTML tags.)

If your comment isn't showing up, it's probably stuck in the spam filter or in moderation. Instead of typing the same comment over and over and sending it, contact us. Most comments are visible within a few minutes of their posting.
This site is not an open forum: we have rules. Read our discussion policy for more details.

Trackback responses to this post