JapanProbe Friends - Featured Members


North Korea test fires missiles!

July 5th, 2006 by James

Well, it finally happened.  Those crazy North Koreans launched a few test missiles this morning.  The missile that was supposed to be able to hit the USA failed its test launch.  But that doesn’t really matter much to the Japanese, who are still very much in range of North Korea’s short range missiles.



Related Posts:
 

North Korea constructing new missiles bases to strike Japan

Abe: Japan will not make nuclear weapons

North Korea Fires Missiles, Again.

Zainichi North Korean girl comments on politics and discrimination (Video)

North Korean nuke test on Sunday?


RSS feed | Trackback URI

2 Comments »

2006-07-08 10:50:26

The hell they should… BTW, who’s that newscaster… even with the angry face, she looks cute.

Nice blog, visiting for the first time.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

 
2006-07-08 10:50:26

The hell they should… BTW, who’s that newscaster… even with the angry face, she looks cute.

Nice blog, visiting for the first time.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

 
2006-07-12 08:52:02

Well, I found out it’s Ms. Mariko Seyama. Wow, it’s quite young actually…

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

 
2006-07-12 08:52:02

Well, I found out it’s Ms. Mariko Seyama. Wow, it’s quite young actually…

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment. (Please close your HTML tags.)

If your comment isn't showing up, it's probably stuck in the spam filter or in moderation. Instead of typing the same comment over and over and sending it, contact us. Most comments are visible within a few minutes of their posting.
This site is not an open forum: we have rules. Read our discussion policy for more details.

Trackback responses to this post